Uncategorized


THE missing MDC-UK funds has netted its first casualty with confirmed reports that the former Provincial Treasurer Mr Tendai Goneso has been suspended from the party amid allegations that he withdraw party funds on-line despite being officially suspended by Secretary General Tendai Biti.

Biti suspended the Jonathan Chawora led MDC-UK and Ireland province which was subsequently dissolved following serious allegations of financial mismanagement that unravelled up to £57 000 being unaccounted for up to this day.

In a provincial meeting chaired by the newly-elected Tonderai Samanyanga, the council resolved to suspend Goneso with immediate effect pending further investigations.

According to a statement released by the MDC-UK and Ireland yesterday, a Commission of Enquiry consisting of the Provincial Vice Chair, Provincial Treasurer, Secretary for Legal Affairs, Midlands North Treasurer, Southeast District Chair was appointed to investigate the Financial Affairs and Procedures at Districts and Branches.

Source said Goneso who is directly responsible for the missing £57 000,00 allegedly went ahead and withdrew nearly £1000,00 after being suspended.

Many believe Goneso should be reported to the fraud squad arguing that if true, the matter constituted criminal behaviour of the highest order.

(Source)

The Zimbabwe coalition government Power Development minister Elton Mangoma and MDC Deputy-Treasurer Energy has been arrested again.

“Honourable Elton Mangoma was this morning picked up by the police from his house. More details to follow,” read a cell phone text message sent by the Morgan Tsvangirai led Movement of Democratic Change’s (MDC-T) information department to a Radio VOP reporter.

When Radio VOP called Mangoma’s lawyer Selby Hwacha it had not yet been clear on why the MDC deputy treasurer general had been arrested.

“Call me later. I am actually on my way to the police. I do not know yet why he has been arrested,” said Hwacha.

Mangoma was arrested two weeks ago on alleged violation of tender procedures after he had allegedly ordered the country’s oil company, Noczim, to source diseal supplies from a little known South African company without going to tender.

He is out on bail and his trial is set to kick off on March 28.

Last week, the state media reported that Mangoma faced fresh charges after he allegedly instructed the cancellation of a tender involving the purchase and supply of prepayment revenue management system, meters and associated equipment, just as the winner was about to be announced.

The MDC believes that arrest of Mangoma and other MDC MPs is part of a renewed crackdown on Zanu (PF) opponents by President Robert Mugabe’s regime.

The MDC is desperate for numbers in Parliament as the party is seeking to retain the speaker of the house of assembly’s post which was rendered vacant after a Supreme Court ruling two weeks ago nullifying Lovemore Moyo’s election to the influential post.

(Source)

Good evening Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen.

On behalf of my wife, Heather, my party, the Movement for Democratic Change, and indeed the people of Zimbabwe, I thank you for the opportunity of talking to you this evening.

The continuing trials and tribulations of Zimbabwe, I am sure, feel far away, and utterly disconnected from this beautiful city of Cape Town, and from your conference deliberations. I trust that you have enjoyed your visit and that the conference has been successful.

I hope my short address will help reinforce the inescapable reality that when citizens are abused, ignored and downtrodden by despotic regimes, they will ultimately seize centre stage in their quest for justice and meaningful participation in Government. This is a universal phenomenon. It is a phenomenon that is playing out dramatically in Libya, but is underway in dozens of countries.

I doubt whether the idealistic and incredible entrepreneurial founders of Apple, and social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter, could have believed that their company creations and respective technologies would become some of the best weapons available for the defeat of tyrants!

But we must not digress along this train of thought. Instead, I ask you all to bear with me as I briefly explain how I – a simple White African farmer – have become the target that I am for Mugabe’s racist ZANU-PF.

I am biased, no doubt, but Charleswood Estate is probably the most beautiful farm I have ever seen. Buried deep in the Chimanimani Mountains in Eastern Manicaland, its splendour and impact on me has been as profound as the rolling hills of Ixopo in Kwa-Zulu Natal were upon the late Alan Paton in his memorable novel, ‘Cry the Beloved Country’. Charleswood was a coffee estate, belonging to Lonrho. It was out on a limb, run down and in disrepair. Having been so struck with its magnificence – and the commercial opportunities it offered – I faced a crossroads, a turning point in my family’s life. A comfortable life of tobacco farming in northern Zimbabwe had to be exchanged for a new journey into the remote Chimanimani Mountains.

I am a son of Zimbabwe. I speak Shona fluently. I am continually and deeply humbled by the spontaneous generosity and innate decency of most ordinary Zimbabweans. Before moving to Charleswood, and out of respect for local culture and community hierarchy, I met with the region’s tribal leaders to discuss my plans for the rejuvenation of Charleswood. Charleswood is divided by the Zhunguniu River. To the north lies the Chikukwa Communal Lands and to the south the Ngorma Communal Lands. It is with the two chiefs of these areas that I met and, in a traditional way, made representation that I would like to purchase Charleswood. Ancestrally, the land was theirs and I could only have it once I had their endorsement, acceptance and approval. I needed to follow certain cultural and traditional practices: the respective Chiefs came to Charleswood and carried out ceremonies on three separate occasions – traditional beer was brewed, livestock was slaughtered, and for three days at a time ancestors were consulted until approval, endorsement and acceptance was conveyed to me.

I fervently wished to kick-start a vertically integrated coffee industry, and in so doing act as the catalyst for a commercially sustainable agro industry – one that would be good for me and for a desperately poor community. My life, Heather’s life, and those of our two children, have been completely turned on their heads by the whole-hearted acceptance and steadfast affection of the Chimanimani people. What an incredibly brave, principled community. I was privileged to represent them in Parliament on behalf of the MDC, before being jailed and expelled from the House of Assembly.

You see, ladies and gentleman, once our farming enterprise gathered momentum – with the community participating on the basis of an agreement we negotiated during our initial discussions – the people of Chimanimani subsequently took deep offence to ZANU-PF rejecting me as their local candidate in the 2000 parliamentary elections. (Not that I asked to embark on a career as a politician. I can think of nothing worse, let me tell you!) However, the Chimanimani tribal elders, after being rebuffed by ZANU-PF, dragged me to Harare to meet Morgan Tsvangirai, the recently elected leader of the newly-formed MDC. While offended by ZANU’s arrogance, the elders were not surprised – they had expected me to be rejected and had made contingency plans. Morgan welcomed me and the people of Chimanimani into the arms of the party. To say that my family’s life has been a roller coaster ride since then is obviously one hell of an understatement! But the people of Chimanimani, Manicaland and Zimbabwe are my daily inspiration.

The racist refusal by ZANU-PF to permit my nomination,followed by that party’s rejection by the voters of Chimanimani and by the people of Manicaland, was ground breaking in Zimbabwean politics. It’s like the ANC facing defeat in the Eastern Cape, or Labour losing Scotland to the Tories!

Nearly a decade later, in 2008, MDC again won another skewed election – we won it by a wide margin. Don’t for one minute believe the results presented by MUGABE’S fraudulent polling officers, more than one month after the event . The MDC won twenty-two of the twenty-eight seats in Manicaland. Indeed, since 2000, my life has been enriched in one sense, knowing that the rural people of Manicaland have stayed strong, solidly supporting MDC through thick and thin. For its part, ZANU-PF knows it has lost all credibility in Manicaland and across the nation. Our party’s urban support base is now replicated in rural areas the length and breadth of Zimbabwe. Robert Mugabe’s recent pathetic appeal to the people of Manicaland, to return to the arms of ZANU-PF, gave me great comfort and satisfaction. People power, symbolised and embodied by the people of remote Chimanimani, will win through, however long it takes. In my own round-about way, I feel I am getting us back to Libya, Kenya, Ivory Coast and Egypt, which is where I began my address.

Recent developments in these countries have highlighted and stripped bare the duplicity and hypocrisy of many of our Western friends, as individual countries and companies are shown to have abandoned principle and decency for relative short-term gain. That they now claim to be on the side of the people is grossly and glaringly cynical. The lessons for us all, and for those businesses you invest in, is that widespread social community acceptance is the fundamental prerequisite for sustainable long-term investment in Africa—be it in Egypt, South Africa, Zambia or Zimbabwe – or, for that matter, anywhere in the world.

Zimbabwe offers some of Africa’s most promising natural resources investment opportunities. Impala Platinum, Anglo American and Rio Tinto, and a host of other companies, are currently reviewing and expanding their investment portfolios there. Against this positive scenario are Mugabe’s threats and bluster relating to so-called ‘indigenisation’. These threats amount to no more than the ZANU-PF equivalent of a 1920’s-style Chicago Mob shakedown. This destructive and counterproductive strategy is a blatant ploy to enrich a politically corrupt elite – an elite rejected by the people. It goes without saying that any process of enriching individuals or companies connected to this infamous criminal syndicate WILL be nullified once the MDC are in power. And those who think they can hedge their bets by building bridges with certain corrupt opportunists who have attached themselves to MDC are seriously underestimating the determination and anger of the majority.

Zimbabwe’s wonderful investment opportunities favour the brave. Ethical Investments made through Zimbabwe’s Inclusive Government – and which meet the requirements of legality and transparency – need not fall foul of political skulduggery in the long term. Such investments can stand the test of time and will be restored by an MDC government if they are violated in the interim.

A word of advice, though. Why is it that local communities – not only in Zimbabwe, but also in South Africa, Congo, Zambia and so on – communities which are adjacent to mining developments, are not properly incorporated into structured entities as ‘indigenous partners’? There are such obvious long term advantages to be derived from local community acceptance. In South Africa, the Royal Bafokeng example, goes some way to address this issue However, my personal relationship with the people of Chimanimani on our collective social agricultural experiment provides powerful evidence of the strength and value of community loyalty; it shows clearly the benefit of genuine local participation.

We in the MDC wish to see transparent, simple community funding as an anchor and pillar of natural resources exploitation. We do not wish to see a replication of the South African example as a model for our empowerment requirements – one where, in nearly every case, the enrichment of ruling party members has occurred at the expense of poor communities. Rio Tinto and Impala Platinum are embarking on new investments in Zimbabwe. Shareholders in these companies must now insist that they reflect the demands of this rapidly evolving new world order; they must incorporate genuinely broad-based community equity participation. It is simply unacceptable for politicians, whether ZANU-PF or MDC, to throw their hats into the ring and emerge with significant stakes in companies in the midst of such poverty. The anger of the people of Egypt directed at all the symbols of enrichment by Mubarak’s family and cronies should be heeded by us in Southern Africa.

In the Zimbabwean context, there is a need for reflection by major mining houses. Some of these institutions must come to terms with their unacceptable complicity in Mugabe’s blackmail. This is a story that cannot be left untold. There is no excuse for Impala Platinum, in an effort to placate ZANU-PF and Mugabe, to again offer the state mining rights in ZIMPLATS, a subsidiary it already owns and controls. These assets belong to Impala Shareholders! There is no excuse for Anglo Platinum to have ceded a huge chunk of its ground just before the 2008 elections – ground that was quickly sold on by a desperate and cash-poor ZANU (PF) at a $100 million profit. Shareholders need to demand from management that these rights be properly valued and retained – and not surrendered for the benefit of a blood-thirsty coterie of gangsters. Face the regime down or force them into open and into outright theft. Please don’t legitimise extortion at the expense of the people. Better to lose what you have and regain it later than to sleep with a serial rapist and killer. If you do so, remember that he will not only beat and murder the neighbours, he will turn on YOU in due course and you will be pitied by no-one. You cannot squeal if you have been playing along.

When it comes to engagement, management in companies like Impala Platinum need to initiate a structure for local community participation and for the national benefit which is endorsed by all stakeholders, including the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions. As far as I know, ZCTU have not been invited in to invest in any shape or form. We in the MDC view the success of investment companies in South Africa aligned to trade unions as an entrenchment of democracy in the workplace.

You are a very influential gathering of asset managers, investment companies, private equity and venture capitalists. If you so choose, you can insist that your investments in Southern African natural resources are always directed toward companies where social responsibility principles, which most of us share, are at the heart of empowerment initiatives. The unscrupulous will tell us ‘Business is Business’. For them, the pursuit of profit seems to outweigh the human rights and benefits which ordinary citizens should enjoy.

To illustrate my criticism of the pursuit of ill-advised opportunism, we need to look no further than the sad and seedy role of Old Mutual in the illicit diamond mining that is occurring in the Marange diamond fields of Manicaland. These fields are controlled by the military junta and were attained over the dead bodies of hundreds of impoverished Zimbabweans. This unacceptable example of corporate greed and willful negligence cannot be swept under the carpet any longer. For a respected London-listed financial services company to continue its investment and shareholding in a joint venture with a disreputable scrap metal merchant and – wait for this – an infamous confidante of Robert and Grace Mugabe is simply unbelievable! It is brazen. It is reprehensible and obscene. The company has said (and I quote): “Old Mutual would like to point out that [its]… engagement post-dated any reported wrongdoing in the mining area. As a result, Old Mutual is most certainly not associated with activities which contravenes the human rights of citizens.” This is cant and obfuscation, a blowing of smoke and hot air.

As MDC, we have urged Old Mutual – quietly behind closed doors – to quit their blood-stained investment. The company has not listened, so we now air our greivences publicly. Old Mutual and its partners have benefited from the daylight robbery of mining rights and from massacres by the army and air force of Zimbabwe. In a well-documented orgy of violence, helicopter gunships mowed down civilians in cold blood, ‘clearing the decks’ for the junta’s illegal mining activities.

The opportunity exists for us to use international celebrities from Hollywood and members of the media to mount a Zimbabwean blood diamonds campaign. We warned Old Mutual of the danger of substantial contagion to their share price should this campaign get underway.

The shame for Old Mutual is compounded by the fact that the proceeds from the sales of these Blood Diamonds are being used by ZANU-PF to unleash another bout of political violence on ordinary Zimbabweans. The International Red Cross are currently feeding starving residents from Marange Communal Lands, an area adjacent to the diamond mines, while a shameless, ruthless and predatory elite plunder the resources of the Zimbabwean people and use the proceeds to inflict violence on them! The Kimberley Process is in complete disarray. Within the Inclusive Government, the MDC cannot exercise the control needed to ensure these activities are properly subject to credible scrutiny, so it is incumbent on responsible corporates to heed our advice. This kind of corporate misbehaviour, deliberately myopic, provocatively arrogant and conspicuously inconsistent with the interests of the Zimbabwean people, is indicative of a looter’s mentality and it will boomerang on the perpetrators.

But I am not finished with Old Mutual quite yet. As if blood diamonds were not enough, this company has maintained a significant share in Zimpapers, the publisher of the government-controlled Herald, among others. If ever there was a practitioner of hate-speech and an apostle of vice and violence, this is it. This dirty little rag plays a very real part in the butchery and battery of our people. If this were 1994, I might well urge Old Mutual to go ahead and invest in that mouthpiece of the Hutu extremists, RTLM. The fundamental differences between Hutu and ZANU propaganda are scant. In a lame defence, Old Mutual has said “we do not influence or involve ourselves in the operational policy or practice of Zimpapers”. But in the same statement it goes on to say: “While we remain mindful of and sensitive to the social and political climate in Zimbabwe, these investments are… meant to meet needs and expectations in terms of returns for our Zimbabwean customers.” There’s no need to continue. We have heard you loud and clear. Profit before principle – and the Zimbabwean people be damned.

Many of you are able – and I urge you to do so—to bombard Julian Roberts in London with the question: ‘HOW, AND HOW AGAIN, COULD OLD MUTUAL INVESTMENT GROUP, ‘OMIGSA’, ever have invested in such sordid partnerships?’

These are but a couple of examples of the companies that have, and continue, to walk the halls of shame in Zimbabwe. There is no shortage of them. When the day of judgement comes, I will not lift a finger to save them from the consequences of their actions. Quite the contrary. And I am unreservedly confident that I will have a powerful constituency behind me. If these companies choose to reap the whirlwind, then so be it.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I hope that my address has not contrasted too sharply with the positive meetings you have had in this wonderful city. But I cannot over-emphasise the importance of you insisting that the companies you invest in are conducting their activities in countries like Zimbabwe with the blessing and support of the people and – concurrently – with the objective of advancing the interests of these communities, and NOT the political elite.

Regrettably Western Governments, which should have set an example, have looked the other way for years. They did it during the Cold War and they are still doing it. Dictators like Gadaffi – Mugabe’s long-running friend and supporter – only prosper when governments ‘look the other way’, be they British, Italian or American. In Libya’s case, the people were mere spectators in an undignified scramble for oil in which Western companies divided the spoils with the Gaddafi clique. The turmoil there was a long time coming.

In Zimbabwe’s case, a new dawn of hope for economic growth and long-term prosperity for our people beckons. Our country is richly blessed and endowed with treasure. Will investors clamber over the bodies of our people in a bid to get-rich-quick or will they be patient, supporting truly sustainable development that will bring a win–win for the nation and those who seek a profit?

For this entirely feasible scenario to become a reality we need you to see that your interests and your bottom line are best served by a mature and far-sighted vision – and, frankly, by common human decency. On our side, in the MDC, we see a political transition as our calling. We want and need a process of electoral reform that will give citizens the right to campaign and vote peacefully. I can assure you all that, with these building blocks in place – and with the necessary international observers present and on the ground well in advance of elections – MDC will win a huge majority.

For me personally, I have no political ambitions. I am a product of my circumstances, as I explained earlier. Nevertheless, I will continue to participate and speak out in the interests of ordinary Zimbabweans.

We seek to be free, and for companies to prosper in a society that is relatively free of corruption like Botswana. In the dark days of Apartheid, the grand anti-Apartheid alliance was a key component in the deconstruction of that system. Is the decade-long democratic struggle of the people of Zimbabwe – one in which we seek to rid ourselves of the stench of ZANU-PF’S corruption and violence – not deserving of your collective support? Should we feel guilty asking for South African and international help?

We humbly believe we have earned our right to ask for such support – and we do so in the knowledge that another dictatorship will tumble in the fullness of time.

I hope to have touched you with some sense of the plight facing ordinary Zimbabweans. I thank you all for your indulgence and will endeavour to answer any questions you may have.

(Source: via email)

A Zimbabwean boy aged four has been sent a letter from the Home Office informing him that he and his mother are facing deportation.

British-born Cher Siyamuanya, and his mother Netsui Karota, 28, received separate letters telling them they were ‘liable to removal’ from the UK.

But Ms Karota fears if she is returned to her homeland of Zimbabwe she will be executed or jailed for speaking out against Robert Mugabe’s brutal regime.

This would mean that Cher could be thrown into prison with her, or forced to live as an orphan on the country’s lawless streets.

An immigration judge said her story was ‘a pack of lies’ and ordered her out of Britain.

In a heartfelt plea to Home Office officials, she said: ‘I can’t go back there, I don’t know what will happen.

‘They sent me and Cher letters last month saying we are ‘liable to removal’, he can’t read or understand his, but he is worried when he sees me worried.’

Ms Karota came to the UK in 2006 after fleeing Zimbabwe via Malawi. Her parents were both murdered.

Ms Karota fears if she is returned to Zimbabwe she will be executed or jailed for speaking out against Robert Mugabe’s regime

She obtained a Malawian passport for the journey after being refused a Zimbabwean one as a member of the pro-democracy group, the Movement for Democratic Change.

UK officials believe she is Malawian and want to deport her and Cher, who was born in Liverpool Women’s Hospital, to that country.

But because of an extradition deal between Malawi and Zimbabwe, Ms Karota fears her and her son will be handed over to Zimbabwean authorities.

Ms Karota, who is vice-chairman of the Restoration of Human Rights in Zimbabwe, said: ‘They have seen me protesting here, at the gates of the Zimbabwean embassy in London.’

Since coming to Liverpool, she has become part of the community as a regular member at the Hope City Church, a volunteer for Woman Asylum Seekers Together and a member of the Liverpool African association. Cher did attend nursery, but his mother is now too afraid to let him out of her sight.

She added: ‘I just want to say something, even though things look so bad. I want people to know that I’ve been here and that I tried, for me and for my son.’

Despite being born in Britain, Cher is due to be deported as a member of the family of a person who does not have leave to remain in the UK.

Cher’s father is a Zimbabwean who was granted British citizenship and lives in the UK, but he only has irregular contact.

A UK Border Agency spokesperson said: ‘Ms Karota’s case has been carefully considered by the UK Border Agency and by two separate courts. However, the immigration judge said she had told a pack of lies and invented a tissue of untruths in order to attempt to stay in this country.

‘The UK has a proud tradition of providing protection to those who genuinely need our help, but when someone is found by the UK Border Agency and the courts not to need our protection we expect them to leave.’

(Source)

When the ZANU PF Women’s League announced last Sunday that it wanted President Robert Mugabe to stand for elections next year and ‘rule forever’, it was in fact calling for violence.

“We endorse your candidature. We are saying: stand in the next election and rule forever,” ZANU PF Secretary for Women’s Affairs, Oppah Muchinguri, was quoted by state-owned media. “Your work cannot be compared to that of anyone else. Do not leave us.”

Declaring Mugabe the party’s sole candidate for the next elections and asking him to rule Zimbabwe forever is a stab in the back for the thousands of women and men who have endured violence from Mugabe’s ZANU PF party over the past decade. By making such a declaration, Muchinguri was effectively silencing the majority of women who live in the rural areas and who bear the brunt of Mugabe’s vicious attacks.

Mugabe is now synonymous with violence. He once said he had ‘degrees in violence’.  Mugabe is currently in power by default. After having lost the 2008 presidential election to Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Morgan Tsvangirai, he unleashed violence on the electorate resulting in 200 mostly MDC supporters killed, several others injured maimed, tortured and displaced from their homes.

Thousands of women and girls were raped. There have been no reparations.  Any decent help has mainly come from well wishers outside the country. The women struggle daily with the physical and psychological scars of their abuse. This is despite that Zimbabwe is signatory to the Convention of the Elimination of all Discrimination Against Women (Cedaw).  Some of the women in the ZANU PF Women’s League go around the world talking about Cedaw yet say nothing about their leader, Mugabe who uses the army, central intelligence officers, party youth militia and war veterans to instil fear, torture and kill innocent people.  It is therefore shocking to hear Muchinguri calling for life presidency for Mugabe.

Mugabe and his right hand men in the army and police have deliberately ignored violence by refusing to persecute the perpetrators who still roam freely and continue to issue more threats to defenceless citizens despite the setting of the Healing Organ.

Women constitute the majority of the population in Zimbabwe. The majority of these live in the rural areas where ZANU PF maintains a stronghold. The women have been cowered into silence. They have been threatened with denial of food and have been labelled sell outs for unseating ZANU PF political heavyweights by voting for the opposition. They do not have a voice. It is their urban counterparts like Muchinguri, who live in airy homes in Borrowdale, who make decisions on their behalf.  It is very clear that Muchinguri is singing for her supper.

Zimbabwe’s constitution making process is currently on hold in Harare and Chitungwiza due to violence. The process has been characterised by violence in most parts of the country while in some areas people have been threatened with death if they utter a word, especially in areas where army personnel have been planted.

If Mugabe is for the people then ZANU PF should let nature take its course. The constitution making process should be completed properly then a referendum held under peaceful conditions before a free and fair election so that people once again choose a leader of their choice.

(Source)

Approaching his 87th birthday next February, President Robert Mugabe appears to give his friends a few birthday gift ideas as he walks unsteadily down the steps prompting aides to offer some support.
These pictures were taken as Mugabe left the closing ceremony of the African Union’s Summit in Kampala, Uganda, on July 27.
Mugabe, who still looks fit for his age, has never been seen in public with a walking stick and until recently, was bouncing up and down the steps of Air Zimbabwe planes – an image his PR people were happy to put out as it showed their man to be robust and raring.
But these pictures from Uganda show a man struggling to hold onto his youthful stoicism that has helped him stay in power for an incredible 30 years – for his minders and his Zanu PF party an unwelcome reminder that aging is mandatory, and he too is vulnerable to the pulling power of the end of time.
Surprisingly, Mugabe’s cabinet colleagues speak of a man whose attentiveness at meetings belies his advanced age.
A senior minister from Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC party revealed recently: “Cabinet meetings start around 9AM and Mugabe can go all the way up to 1 or 2PM without taking a break, all the time listening intensely to the proceedings, but rarely talking himself.
“There is no question he’s doing better than many at his age.”
The teetotaller President is known to exercise regularly and is a big fan of yoga – a combination that has helped him stay fit and outfox his opponents despite growing public disaffection.
(Source)

The power struggles in the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) led by Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai have re-ignited debate on who really pulls the strings in the former opposition party. Party president Tsvangirai and Tendai Biti, the secretary-general, were always seen as the main protagonists. But Ian Makone’s name continues to pop up in the fray. In political circles he has always been touted as a financier, king-maker and eminence grise behind the MDC-T but he has not been popular among the rank and file of the party.

Makone, a permanent secretary and adviser to Tsvangirai, is widely considered a “Johnny-come-lately” in the party who landed the top post from “nowhere” and is accused of destabilising MDC-T. His close relationship with Tsvangirai has also become a source of discomfort among some senior members of the party. Senior MDC officials say their advice and even access to the PM has been curtailed by Makone.

“Makone has ring-fenced Tsvangirai and it is now difficult to have access to him,’” said one MDC-T official who requested anonymity.

“This is why there is factionalism as some members feel Makone is getting too powerful and yet he only came in much later.”

They claimed that Makone came close to Tsvangirai at a time when the party was facing serious financial problems. Makone and his wife Theresa, the sources said, bailed out the party by paying salaries for MDC-T staff as well as pumping out money for the day-to-day operations.

“He came in as a donor because he has good connections in the white community and the corporate world where he worked for a long time,” said another a senior MDC-T official who requested anonymity.

“So this is now pay-back time for Tsvangirai.”

The current factionalism and violence has been linked to a power struggle between Biti and Makone. The two are reportedly jostling for the position of secretary-general which Biti holds, ahead of the party’s national congress next year. When the MDC split into two factions in 2005, Makone was outvoted by Biti but sources said the permanent secretary, an astute businessman and political schemer, is still determined to take up that post to consolidate his position in the popular movement.

Makone joined the party a few years after its formation through Professor Welshman Ncube’s office. Ncube was then secretary-general but Makone managed to manoeuvre his way into Tsvangirai’s inner circle. But he rose to prominence when he was appointed as one of the first political negotiators between MDC and Zanu PF after the disputed 2002 Presidential elections. He was later appointed director of elections.

It was during this tenure that he was arrested, detained and tortured by security forces in the aftermath of the March 2007 police brutalities. He was accused of training MDC activists to bomb police stations across the country. Before joining politics, Makone ran several businesses and sat on many boards of parastatals. He was also a chairman of First Mutual Life Society (FMLS), the country’s second largest life assurance company, where he worked with Norman Sachikonye, who is now a principal director in the Prime Minister’s Office.

In 2002, there was a campaign to have Makone placed on the European Union sanctions list imposed on President Robert Mugabe and his cronies because FMLS relied heavily on companies with government links such as Olivine and Zisco.

“Some have wondered why he has not been included on the list of persons barred from visiting America if his company benefits from government-owned company pensions,” wrote The Herald then.

Makone, the first black general manager of the Grain Marketing Board (GMB), also worked for Manica Freight Services, where he was responsible for the southern Africa region including countries such as Tanzania and Kenya. Sources said Makone is close to the Minister of Economic Planning and Investment Promotion Elton Mangoma after they worked together at the Agricultural Finance Corporation (AFC) now Agribank. Then he was the chairman of the corporation.

Those close to Makone said he accumulated his vast wealth as a consultant for Mugabe’s administration through his businesses and the several companies he chaired before venturing into politics. Repeated efforts to get a comment from Makone were fruitless last week. His office said he was in meetings for the greater part of the week. On Saturday, he refused to talk to The Standard on party spokesperson Nelson Chamisa’s mobile phone. Chamisa however denied that Makone was preventing party officials and supporters from accessing Tsvangirai.

“The president is accessible at all levels,” said Chamisa. “Our challenge is actually that he is too much accessible which however is not even a problem considering that we are a broad-based party.”

He also refuted allegations that Makone at one point financed the party saying the allegations are malicious.

“There is no basis for such kind of malicious and dishonest allegations,” Chamisa said.

“Makone is a loyal and dedicated cadre of the party and his credentials are beyond scrutinising and questioning.”

Chamisa could not confirm whether Makone was once a government consultant.

Apart from owning several properties in Harare, his towering two-storey house in rural Domboshava, just outside Harare, is a spectacle. The house is guarded by armed state security details. However, in politics the name Makone has become synonymous with factionalism in the MDC-T over the past few years. His wife, Theresa, has also been entangled in factionalism after she allegedly elbowed Lucia Matibenga out of the race to lead the MDC-T’s women’s assembly in 2007, nearly splitting the party again into two camps.

In that conflict Tsvangirai supported Theresa to the chagrin of many of his supporters. But what further baffles those in the MDC-T is that while Makone appears to be very close to Tsvangirai, Theresa is a confidante of Jocelyn Chiwenga, the wife of Zimbabwe Defence Forces (ZDF) commander Constantine Chiwenga. The Public Works minister confirmed to the Zimbabwe Independent in 2007 that Jocelyn was her “long-standing friend”.

Ironically, Jocelyn’s husband is one of the service chiefs who have vowed not to salute Tsvangirai even if he wins an election to become the president of the country.

(Source)

Zimbabwean opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai has said power-sharing negotiations have broken down and are unlikely to resume soon, South Africa‘s Talk Radio 702 reported on Wednesday. The talks have stalled over how executive power should be shared by President Robert Mugabe and Tsvangirai, who refused to sign an agreement that would have made him prime minister. Tsvangirai has protested against a proposed deal, saying it did not give him enough executive powers in government. The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader said he refused to sign a deal with Mugabe because the proposal would have given the veteran leader control of security forces. “There was an attempt to fragment the Cabinet. With some ministries reporting to the president and some ministries reporting to the prime minister,” he told Talk Radio 702. “In this case the economic and social ministries will go to the prime minister. The security ministries will go to the president.”

Talk Radio 702 quoted Tsvangirai as saying he “was not aware of plans” for the talks to resume soon. Tsvangirai beat Mugabe in a March 29 election but fell short of enough votes to avoid a run-off vote, which was won by Mugabe unopposed after Tsvangirai pulled out citing violence and intimidation against his supporters. The deadlock has worsened a catastrophic economic decline marked by the world’s highest inflation rate of over 11-million percent, and chronic food, fuel and foreign currency shortages that have driven millions of Zimbabweans to regional countries. Mugabe, in power since independence from Britain in 1980, is expected to announce a Cabinet soon, a move the MDC has warned would endanger efforts to form a national unity government. South African President Thabo Mbeki, mandated by regional countries to mediate in the Zimbabwe talks, has drawn fire for not taking a tough line with Mugabe, a policy he says would only exacerbate tensions. Tsvangirai was critical of Mbeki. “The mediator says there is sufficient grounds for us to sign. He is not the one who is going to sign. It’s me.”

(Source)

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe opened parliament in defiance of opposition objections on Tuesday and said there was ”every expectation” of a power-sharing deal to end a post-election political crisis.

But heckling by parliamentarians from the main opposition party drowned out Mugabe’s speech, underscoring the bitterness of the divide.

”Landmark agreements have been concluded, with every expectation that everyone will sign up,” said Mugabe, 84, who has ruled Zimbabwe with his ZANU PF party since independence from Britain in 1980.

But parliamentarians from the opposition Movement for Democratic Change chanted ”ZANU is rotten!” and ”We have a pact with the people.”

The MDC said Mugabe had no right to open the chamber and warned that the move would endanger the deadlocked negotiations.

But the party’s parliamentarians nonetheless attended the opening of parliament, backing the MDC official who was elected to the powerful Speaker position on Monday.

ZANU PF also holds a key post as head of the Senate, intensifying a power struggle as the two parties come under mounting pressure to reach a breakthrough that could allow them to deal with Zimbabwe’s growing economic catastrophe.

ZANU PF won a vote for the presidency of the upper house of parliament, the Senate – where it has a majority – meaning it can block legislation passed by parliament.

Negotiations between ZANU PF and the MDC have stalled over what the opposition says is Mugabe’s refusal to give up executive power after 28 years in office.

(Source)

President Thabo Mbeki was part of the Zimbabwe problem by using the continuing violence in the country to blackmail the opposition into talks, Allan Boesak said on Sunday.

He called on churches and religious bodies to find ways to put pressure on Mbeki and Zimbabwe‘s rulers to stop the violence there, after victims testified at the international HIV and Aids conference this week about the systematic rape of opposition supporters.

Boesak was part of a delegation of reformed churches, including the Presbyterian and Unitarian churches, which gathered last month near Benoni for a special summit on Zimbabwe. Their subsequent submission to the presidency was critical of Mbeki’s handling of the crisis.

This week South African Council of Churches (SACC) president Tinyiko Maluleke said the council had not been satisfied with the response. He said the presidency had asked the delegation to bring evidence on the level and scope of the violence.

“We handed a comprehensive dossier to his office, but were are not happy with the response,” he said.

After Zimbabwe‘s March 29 election, Mbeki dispatched a team of retired generals to probe the violence, but their report had never been published.

The opposition Movement for Democratic Change said at least 120 of its officials and supporters had been murdered, while non-governmental stalwarts such as Elinor Sisulu said the figure could well be more than 600.

Boesak said on Sunday the group was receiving e-mails and phone calls daily from victims of violence.

At the Aids conference in Mexico this week, a group of women recounted how they had been raped by government militias.

The SACC had been particularly upset about increasing reports of limbs being hacked off, which is reminiscent of the infamous amputations of the hands of participants in Sierra Leone elections during the reign of Fody Sankoh.

This information had been gathered at great risk by churchgoers and others across Zimbabwe, said Boesak.

The presidency’s response had been one “we had become used to”, he said – one of “stilstuipe” (Afrikaans for an attack of silence). “It raises the fundamental question, why is the violence still continuing?” asked Boesak. “Why is Mbeki not getting Mugabe to stop the violence? How can a real, honest settlement be achieved while violence is being perpetrated on innocent people?”

He accused Mbeki of using the violence to put the MDC in an ” invidious” position during the talks – forcing the organisation into negotiations in a morally disadvantageous position, because Mbeki told them the violence would stop only if they took part.

Boesak said this hidden agenda was being played out in the talks.

Maluleke cast doubt on the whole exercise of the talks. “What is the use of a political settlement if the people have to live in the midst of death?” he asked.

Boesak said the talks should no longer be about “making a pact with the devil”, but about securing peace. He suggested that pressure from all sides and of all sorts, including renewed calls for sanctions, be maintained on the Mugabe regime, and on Mbeki, to stop the violence.

During their first submission, the church leaders called on regional governments to refuse to recognise Mugabe as president. They also called on Mbeki to desist from making statements showing a partiality to Mugabe.

(Source)

« Previous PageNext Page »