google
yahoo
bing

Heroes & Villains


First Lady Grace Mugabe has been fingered as one of the biggest beneficiaries from the diamonds from the controversial Chiadzwa fields after it emerged she is a shareholder in Mbada Diamonds.

Mbada Diamonds is one of the companies that were clandestinely awarded mining rights at Chiadzwa by President Robert Mugabe’s government.

Government sources revealed the First Lady had a substantial interest in Mbada Diamonds together with little known South African company, Grandwell Holdings and the Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation.

“The First Lady is one of the shareholders in Mbada Diamonds,” said an official from the ministry of mines.

The official said eyebrows were raised after the First Lady was constantly meeting Robert Mhlanga, Mbada Diamonds’ chairperson.

Mhlanga, a retired Zimbabwe Airforce Vice Marshall, is a close confidante to the First Family dating to the days of the Congo war when he was still in active service and as President Mugabe’s personal helicopter pilot.

Mbada Diamonds caused a furor last year after it clandestinely flew over 300 000 carats of diamonds to Harare International Airport from Chiadzwa without police supervision.

The company wanted to auction the gems but the sale was stopped at the eleventh hour.

It was feared that the non-transparent manner in which the diamonds were transported, could have created room for corruption with some loads being diverted to other destinations before they reached Harare.

They were also worries that the government had no presence at the fields mined by Mbada Diamonds. With no representative on the ground, government had no idea how much Mbada was mining.

Human rights groups have in the past accused President Mugabe’s government of plundering the precious resource in Chiazdwa.

A human rights activist based in Mutare, Farai Maguwu burnt his fingers after he attempted to expose human rights violations and the looting of the gems by senior officials in government.

Maguwu was arrested and detained for five weeks on charges of spreading falsehoods prejudicial to the state.

He is out on stringent bail conditions. Police arrested Maguwu again on Monday and charged him with possession of a stolen vehicle.ends

(Source)

President Robert Mugabe’s younger sister, Sabina, has died. She was 75 years old.

Sabina, the mother of Leo Mugabe, Patrick and Robert Zhuwao, passed on at around 4am on today at Harare’s Avenues Clinic where she had been admitted since last Friday after allegedly complaining of stomach pains.

Sabina, who quit active politics two year’s ago, had been in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as doctors unsuccessfully battled to save her life.

An official announcement of the death is expected later today and would be broadcast on national radio and television.

Born on October 14, 1934, Sabina bowed down from active politics due to ill health before the 2008 harmonised elections, with unconfirmed reports at the time suggesting her retirement was due to ill health.

Sabina, who was nearly 10 years junior to Mugabe, 86, served as a Member of Parliament (MP) for Makonde East in 1985 and later became the legislator for Zvimba South constituency between 1990 and 2008.

She was also a member of the ZANU PF women’s league serving as its national secretary for production and labour.

During her time in active politics Sabina was part of what seemed to be the Mugabe political dynasty with President Mugabe ruling the country while she served in parliament with her two sons and their cousin, prominent business Philip Chiyangwa.

(Source)

President Mugabe briefly returned from his annual leave to bury the widow of veteran nationalist Leopold Takawira who was declared a national hero and interred at the national shrine in Harare yesterday.

Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai made his second official appearance at the Heroes Acre and was accompanied by his two deputies, Arthur Mutambara and Thokozani Khupe. Mugabe’s two deputies, Joyce Mujuru and John Nkomo also attended to complete a rare public appearance of the country’s entire top executive.

Mugabe, who made an unusual departure from his traditional attack of Britain and the West, took most of his speech to recall the works of the late Amai Sunny Ntombiyelanga Takawira and to relive the life of her husband, the legendary Takawira who died in prison in colonial Rhodesia.

His speech would however have been incomplete without mention of the ‘white outsiders’ and Zimbabwe’s sovereignty.

Mugabe said ‘outsiders’ were welcome in Zimbabwe only if they were coming to partner Zimbabweans in the exploitation of the country’s resources for the benefit of Zimbabweans.

“The destiny of our country is in our own hands. Outsiders, yes we need, but only to the extent that they want to partner us in exploiting the country’s resources for the development of Zimbabwe and its people.

“Our country’s interests come first and Zimbabweans must be prepared to defend those interests. The country’s sovereignty is non-negotiable, and the unity of our people remains paramount in all our endeavours.

Ministers and officials from Tsvangirai and Mutambara’s parties made conspicuous appearance leaving analysts wondering if Mugabe and his two protagonists had finally agreed on the contentious criteria for choosing national heroes.

The former opposition leaders had always complained about Mugabe using his party’s supreme governing body, the politburo, to unilaterally decide on who was to be declared a national hero.

This had been presented as one of the reasons why Tsvangirai’s attendance at the national shrine was not always guaranteed.

(Source)

Tony Blair believes that Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe should be overthrown, a German magazine quoted the former British prime minister as saying in an interview published on Wednesday.

“I think if you can get rid of Mugabe, get rid of him. The guy has destroyed his country. There are many people in his country who have died who should not have died, because of what he has done,” Blair told the Stern weekly.

“If you can, you should, but you obviously have to operate in careful limits,” he said.

Blair also rejected criticism that his closeness to the United States and Israel made him unsuitable for his current job as envoy for the Middle East Quartet, mediating between the Jewish state and the Palestinians.

“I can honestly say that not once in all the time that I have been dealing with the Palestinians has the issue of my close relationship with the US or Israel ever been a problem. On the contrary, it is an advantage,” Blair said.

“I remember president (Mahmud) Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, when I had my first conversation with him. I said it might be a disadvantage because of my closeness to America and my strong view on Israel, and he said: ‘That is why you are useful.’”

Blair, who stepped down as British premier in 2007, was former US president George W. Bush’s closest ally in the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and drew criticism for his support of Israel’s bombardment of southern Lebanon in 2006.

The 56-year-old also reiterated that he had no regrets about toppling Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein despite the fact that no weapons of mass destruction — his main argument for the invasion — were found.

“I always say to people the question is very simple in the end: would the region be better off if Saddam was still in power,” he told Stern. “Do I regret having removed him, Saddam Hussein? The answer is frankly, no.”

(Source)

Vice-Prseident Joseph Msika is reportedly on the verge of quitting due to deteriorating health and resurfacing power struggles in ZANU PF involving two rival factions and his restive former ZAPU colleagues. This came as ZANU PF finally set in motion a formal process to manage President Robert Mugabe’s controversial succession.

ZANU PF spokesman Ephraim Masawi last night confirmed his party’s extraordinary politburo meeting yesterday set up a committee chaired by party chairman John Nkomo (pictured) to deal with the succession problem.

The committee also includes rival faction leaders and stalwarts Solomon Mujuru and Emmerson Mnangagwa, Didymus Mutasa, Nicholas Goche, Oppah Muchinguri and Sydney Sekeremayi.

As revealed in the Independent last week, there is a fierce debate going on in ZANU PF over Mugabe’s succession.

In 2003 a ZANU PF succession committee headed by Nkomo was disbanded after it fuelled infighting over who was to take over from Mugabe. Masawi also said the party had set up four other committees to deal with party issues. Mutasa will head a research and ideology committee, Mnangagwa constitutional reform, David Karimanzira finance and economic development and Angeline Masuku mobilisation and media strategy.

The move by Msika to retire, coupled with problems buffeting co-vice-president Joice Mujuru in the party, might leave Mugabe exposed in his party’s intensifying battle over his succession. Msika particularly has been a stabilising factor in ZANU PF which is riddled with divisions, factionalism and infighting.

Sources said Msika who is not attending cabinet and ZANU PF meetings, including politburo ones has told close family and senior party officials that he wants to step down. Msika is battling with health problems and has been in and out of the country for treatment.

However, Mugabe is said to be reluctant to let Msika retire, preferring to keep him in office for life as happened with Joshua Nkomo and Simon Muzenda.

Nkomo and Muzenda died in office due to ill-heath.

“Msika wants to quit because he is not feeling well and the situation has of late been further deteriorating,” a source said. “Close family and party members are aware of this and there are moves to manage his departure well to avoid the usual infighting over his position.”

After’s Nkomo death in 1999 ahead of the party’s congress in December that year there was a battle between Msika and former ZANU PF Women’s League chairperson Thenjiwe Lesabe to succeed him.

Four years later when Muzenda died in 2003, a scramble for his position erupted between Mnangagwa and Mujuru ahead of the party’s congress in December 2004. Mujuru beat Mnangagwa, but the issue continues to fuel power struggles in the party.

Sources said Msika’s decision to leave has triggered a new fight to succeed him. The race is between ZANU PF chair John Nkomo, politburo member Obert Mpofu and Bulawayo governor Cain Mathema. Nkomo is seen as the frontrunner as Mpofu and Mathema are relative lightweights.

Sources said Nkomo, Mpofu and Mathema have been hectically lobbying party stalwarts and ex-combatants to support them in their succession bids.

“There is serious campaigning going on because it is now well known in the party that Msika wants to quit,” a senior ZANU PF official said. “A number of people are interested in his position.”

Sources said one of the reasons Msika wants to leave, apart from ill-health, is the attempt by former ZANU PF politburo member Dumiso Dabengwa and colleagues to revive ZAPU. Msika is said to be in sympathy with Dabengwa and has refused to castigate him in public while many other former ZAPU leaders have been doing so to distance themselves from the initiative that has angered Mugabe.

“Msika supports Dabengwa in principle because he believes he has legitimate grievances, but he does not agree with the approach,” a source close to ZANU PF said. “Even when the issue came up last year he did not confirm or deny he was part of it.”

Former ZAPU leaders, a number of them who are still in the politburo and government, feel Mugabe has only used the merger of the parties to entrench himself and his regional clique, not push a national agenda.

Mugabe has accused Dabengwa of being a tribalist because he wants to resuscitate ZAPU, but Dabengwa’s supporters have rejected this, saying it is Mugabe himself who is a “notorious tribalist”. Dabengwa last year said he left because “I was never Zanu anyway”, prompting Mugabe’s angry attacks.

Dabengwa’s ZAPU held a congress in Bulawayo on May 17. The event was attended by about 3 000 party members from around Zimbabwe and South Africa, as well as ex-combatants from the region. Dabengwa was elected party leader and his deputy is his former ZAPU colleague Canciwell Nziramasanga.

Dabengwa, a close friend and ally of South African President Jacob Zuma, is reportedly being funded by liberation struggle comrades in South Africa, Botswana and Zambia.

(Source)

Zimbabwe’s central bank took hundreds of millions of euros from private bank accounts, including 300,000 euros from a bank account belonging to Hivos, a Dutch development organisation. Corina Straatsma, director of Hivos’ regional office in the Zimbabwean capital, Harare, says 90,000 euros is still missing although the rest has been paid back.

Dr Gideon Gono, governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ), released a statement on Monday admitting that the bank took hundreds of millions in foreign currency from private accounts without either the permission or the knowledge of the account holders. According to the statement, the government needed the money in order to fund loans to state-owned companies and buy grain and energy supplies. According to Mr Gono, “The unorthodox measures helped keep the country afloat”.

Hivos pressuring MDC

Hivos, which is largely dependent on subsidies from the Dutch foreign affairs ministry, is pressuring contacts within the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) to try and get its money back. Last February, the MDC joined a unity government with President Robert Mugabe’s long-governing ZANU-PF party. According to Ms Straatsma,

“The MDC is aware that Zimbabwe needs foreign aid and knows that this situation cannot continue indefinitely”. Mr Gono promised that the RBZ will repay the money - estimated at 1.5 billion euros - it took from private bank accounts but he did not say when it would actually be repaid. Most of the plundered accounts belong to private companies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) such as Hivos. Last year, the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria said 5.64 million euros was missing from its bank account in Zimbabwe. The money has since been returned.

The Zimbabwean government will have to repay almost one billion euros to the RBZ before the central bank can itself repay the money ‘borrowed’. However, the government does not yet have that money.

Local NGOs also affected

Apart from Hivos, Dutch aid organisation SNV also has an office in Zimbabwe. Although SNV’s bank account was not raided, local manager Rik Overmars says numerous local NGOs had their bank accounts plundered. SNV is almost completely dependent on Dutch government subsidies.

Ms Straatsma has confirmed that many of Hivos’ local partner organisations had money taken from their bank accounts. Hivos, in co-operation with the United Nations development fund, is attempting to get the money back. Ms Straatsma says the central bank’s ‘move’ has not jeopardised Hivos’ activities. The aid organisation opened a new bank account in neighbouring Botswana, and Dutch government subsidy money was paid into that account.

Governor under pressure

Analysts say Mr Gono’s admission is an attempt to hold on to his job. In September 2008, just before a coalition accord was agreed with the MDC, President Robert Mugabe reappointed Mr Gono to a second five-year term as central bank governor. However, since Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC joined the unity government in February, there has been considerable pressure on Mr Gono to resign.

The central bank governor is one of the Mr Mugabe’s close allies and his policies have been blamed for the severe economic turmoil in the country. There have been severe food, fuel and cash shortages as well as hyperinflation. The health, education and agriculture system has collapsed and the Zimbabwean dollar became next to worthless. The recent introduction of the US dollar as legal tender has helped bring prices down and there are some goods in the shops again.

South Africa’s finance ministry is investigating the possibility of allowing Zimbabwe to use its currency, the rand, and allowing Harare to join the South Africa, Swaziland and Lesotho monetary union.

Just this week, the new Zimbabwean government called on foreign companies, and in particular South African companies, to invest in Zimbabwe. A government spokesman said, “It’s an investment well worth risking”.

(Source)

roys-return-01.jpg

roys-return-02.jpg

The European Union will add 28 individuals and 36 companies to a list of banned allies of Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe on Monday because of their links to suspected human rights abuses, an EU official said.

The move, due to be finalised at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels, will add new government members and relatives of Mugabe allies to an existing list of around 170 individuals banned from travelling in the 27-country bloc.

“It will for the first time include EU companies,” the official said, without giving further details of how the ban would affect their activities in the EU.

Zimbabwe is in the grip of a humanitarian and economic crisis. Despite growing international calls for him to step down, power-sharing talks between Mugabe and opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai are deadlocked in a row over cabinet posts.

The EU ministers will also look to step up pressure on Mugabe by urging a probe into whether diamond sales are being used to support his government, a draft obtained by Reuters earlier this week showed.

The draft urges the Kimberley Process - an international certification scheme set up to ensure diamonds do not fund conflict - “to take action with a view to ensure Zimbabwe’s compliance with its Kimberley obligations”.

The World Diamond Council industry body has put Zimbabwe’s production of rough diamonds at 0.4 percent of world output, mostly exported with the Kimberley Process certificate. However in December it raised concern about possible illegal exports “for the personal gain of a few”.

Critics say Mugabe’s policies, such as the seizure of white-owned farms, have ruined Zimbabwe’s economy, but the ruler - in power since independence from Britain in 1980 - blames Western sanctions for the crisis.

(Source)

This was emailed to me a few days ago:

“Many news articles on the late Ian Smith contain inaccuracies that need to be corrected. It is neither fair nor honest that some portray him as a white supremist. His policy was “Responsible Government” with a “qualified franchise.” The vote in Rhodesia was not limited to whites, but was a qualified franchise, which required either educational qualification or property ownership.

The fact that the Soviet-backed ZAPU and Red Chinese-backed ZANU terrorist groups murdered black candidates, officials and voters to intimidate the black citizens to withdraw from the electoral process, resulted in an increasingly white government.

However, that was not the policy of Ian Smith who was seeking to move the country to a position where 50 percent of the parliament was black.

As someone who knew Ian Smith well and met him regularly over the past 20 years, I have been surprised to see him described as “embittered and disillusioned”. He was most certainly not!

He had a very positive attitude, stayed in Zimbabwe through the horrific farm invasions and lawless upheavals caused by Mugabe’s dictatorship, and continually worked for the good of the country.

He regularly spoke with great hope and vision for the future.

Whether one agreed with his policies or not, one could only admire his courage, tenacity and integrity.

Also, it should be noted that no one starved in Rhodesia. Even in war time, life under him never degenerated to anything close to what there is now.

Smith was immensely popular with many black Rhodesians as well.

Many black Zimbabweans went to him for advice on how to free the country from Mugabe’s dictatorship.”

Take care.

‘debvhu

It was Ian Smith’s war-damaged left eye that drew people’s attention first: wide open, heavy-lidded and impassive from experimental plastic surgery, it hinted at a dull, characterless nature.

The other was narrow, slanting and slightly hooded. Being watched by it was an uncomfortable experience. Each eye could have belonged to a different person.

A Foreign Office official, in a biographical note to prime minister Sir Alec Douglas Home in 1964, caught the same contradictory appearances: “His pedestrian and humourless manner often conceals a shrewder assessment of a particular situation than at first appears on the surface, and he should not be underrated.”

The advice was not heeded. He held the attention of a fascinated world for more than 15 years with an outrageous rebellion against the British Crown; created a booming economy in the face of United Nations sanctions; and on a shoestring fought a counter-insurgency war that he came close to winning.

His ordinariness and lack of artifice helped make him an extraordinary leader. Farmer, sportsman and quiet-spoken church-going Presbyterian, he saw the world into neat packets of wonderful chaps, terrorists, communists and traitors.

His cold reserve served him both as a Spitfire pilot and in the face of a bawling Harold Wilson. His obstinacy led his personal secretary, Gerald Clarke, to pass on to him a British complaint that “once you have stated your position, they are unable to get you to move”.

Henry Kissinger perceived honour and courage in Smith when he delivered what were effectively the terms of Rhodesia’s surrender, and he wept. He was modest to a fault. He refused to press for the DSO and DFC he deserved after the war, but was not awarded through oversight.

Throughout most of his tenure at Independence, his official residence, anyone could walk down the driveway and knock on the front door.

He was the world’s perfect rebel. Wilson was warned there was a strong likelihood of a mutiny in the British armed forces if he ordered a military suppression of UDI. Former South African foreign minister Pik Botha said Smith could have won an election in South Africa in 1976 while Pretoria was secretly forcing him to accept black rule.

Smith will struggle to lose the image of the arch white racist. But black Zimbabweans after Independence admired him for his unbending, blunt criticism of President Robert Mugabe — giving voice to opinions they dared not utter. As economic decay set in, Mugabe would be haunted by the words of fellow blacks: “It was better under Smith.”

To dismiss his UDI as an attempt to impose a crude white supremacist state is a serious oversimplification. He never evinced the coarse racism of many of his colleagues. His was an anachronistic vision of a sovereign Rhodesia that embodied the traditions and values of an unchanging empire: he saw UDI as a short-term measure that would be quickly resolved, with Rhodesia independent but still closely tied to Britain through the Commonwealth.

The winds of change shattered his vision. By the time he became prime minister, he was up against a Britain that wanted not merely to introduce black rule, but to strip his government of the powers of self-rule granted by Whitehall in 1923.

With the brutality of post-independence Africa vivid in the minds of white Rhodesians, he persisted with “evolutionary, not revolutionary change”.

Thirty-five years after UDI, the racist bogey is less clear. But he remains condemned for ignoring the extreme disparities between blacks and whites, and his refusal to change the situation.

Ian Douglas Smith was born in the village of Selukwe (now Shurugwi) in central Rhodesia on April 8 1919, of a Scottish father, Jock, and Rhodesian-born mother, Agnes. He was educated at Chaplin school in Gweru with moderate academic achievement, captained the first XV and ran the 100 yards in 10 seconds.

He began a Bachelor of Commerce degree at Rhodes University in South Africa in 1938, establishing an impressive academic record and rowing for the university.

War broke out and in 1941 he joined the RAF Empire Air Training Scheme at Guinea Fowl in central Rhodesia. He was posted to 237 (Rhodesia) squadron in the Middle East, flying Hawker Hurricanes.

Taking off from Alexandria on a dawn patrol in 1943, his throttle malfunctioned, he lost height and clipped the barrel of a Bofors gun. He crashed and rammed his face against the Hurricane’s gunsight. He suffered severe facial injuries, broke his jaw, a leg and a shoulder and buckled his back.

Surgeons at the Fifteenth Scottish Hospital in Cairo reconstructed his face and after only five months he rejoined his squadron in Corsica. He realised his dream to fly Spitfire Mark IXs, carrying out strafing raids and escorting American bombers. In mid-1944 Captain Smith was leading a raid on train of fuel tankers in the Po Valley when he made the mistake of going back for a second run.

The Spitfire was hit by an anti-aircraft shell, caught fire and he baled out. Within minutes of landing, a German patrol walked past his hiding place in a bush. He was soon picked up by the Partisani. The five months he spent with them near Sasello, learning Italian, reading Shakespeare and working as a peasant, he regarded as one of the best times of his life.

Near the end of the war, he and three other allied fugitives made their way through occupied Italy to the Maritime Alps. At one point the conspicuously tall, fair-haired Rhodesian strode unhindered through a German checkpoint. He led his tiny group over the mountains, walking barefoot on ice, until they reached an American patrol on the other side.

In 1946, Smith completed his final year at Rhodes where he was also elected chairman of the students’ representative council.

In 1948, he bought his farm, Gwenoro, in the plains of Selukwe, married Janet Watts and in elections in July, became the Liberal Party MP for Selukwe, the youngest MP ever in the Southern Rhodesian parliament.

Fundamental change shook southern African politics in 1960, when he was chief whip of the ruling Federal Party in the parliament of the Rhodesia and Nyasaland Federation.

Harold MacMillan’s tour of Africa ended with his “winds of change” speech in the South African parliament. Rhodesian whites saw from close up the bloody aftermath of Congo independence. The federation was breaking up and independence was inevitable for Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland as Zambia and Malawi respectively - but, to Smith’s bitter resentment, not for Southern Rhodesia.

At home, the voice of Joshua Nkomo was blowing a tide of black resistance with the hitherto unheard of demand for “black majority rule now”.

White opinion hardened. Smith was behind the formation in 1962 of the Rhodesian Front which easily won elections in December the next year, with Smith deputy prime minister and minister of finance.

He first encountered the Foreign Office at a meeting with foreign secretary Rab Butler at Victoria Falls in December 1963. Butler grandly declared that Britain was “very happy to agree” to independence for Southern Rhodesia, at least at the same time as Zambia and Malawi. No minutes were taken. Smith asked Butler for the undertaking in writing. Butler demurred with: “There is trust between members of the British Commonwealth.”

Smith wagged his finger at Butler, and said: “If you break that, you will live to regret it.”

The expression “perfidious Albion” was fixed in his vocabulary from then on.

In April 1964, Smith became the RF’s leader and prime minister. Almost immediately, he imprisoned the entire leadership of the black nationalist movement, and paralysed it for a decade. Wilson’s Labour victory in October that year was a drastic setback to Smith’s hopes.

He rebuffed Wilson’s opening approaches. It took Winston Churchill’s funeral in January 1965 to bring them together.

Smith attended the funeral, but was not invited to the lunch afterwards at Buckingham Palace. He was at his hotel when the Queen’s Equerry arrived, and expressed Her Majesty’s surprise at his absence.

Smith left immediately and was warmly received by the Queen and Prince Philip. Wilson also buttonholed him there and asked him to come to 10 Downing Street that afternoon.

Both men surprised each other at the absence of personal animosity, but their discussions were the first in 15 years of missed chances.

By October, it was becoming increasingly clear that Rhodesia was heading for a unilateral declaration of independence.

Smith - reinforced by a clean sweep by the RF in an election in May - held that illegal independence and “the maintenance of civilised standards” was better than the chaos that white Rhodesia believed would follow an African government.

The government was fully organised for the likelihood of sanctions. Fuel stocks were built up and other essential commodities distributed. Smith had secured the support of South African prime minister Hendrik Verwoerd and Portuguese president Antonio Salazar, for the continuity of Rhodesia’s trade routes through South Africa and Mozambique.

There followed a series of last-ditch shuttles. Smith went to London on October 5, but his talks with Wilson ended with a communique concluding that their positions were “irreconcilable”. Wilson went on television with his grave appeal to Smith: “Prime minister, think again.”

Ten days later Wilson was in Salisbury, with fresh proposals, which Smith rejected.

There was an unexpected personal understanding between the two men. They were on first-name terms, and Smith remarked afterwards “he was closer to us than he was to them” (Nkomo and Sithole whom Wilson met on this trip).

Wilson also betrayed his sympathies with his remark: “I don’t think Rhodesia is in a position to have one-man, one-vote tomorrow.”

On November 5, Smith declared a state of emergency. His cabinet met on November 10 to discuss final arrangements for UDI. At 7.30 pm British high commissioner Jack Johnstone was allowed to present the meeting with an appeal from Wilson. Wilson telephoned Smith at 8.30 the next morning, when the cabinet was about to take the final vote. For 30 minutes, Wilson pleaded quietly. Smith told him it had already gone too far.

He returned to the cabinet room and told them of his discussion with Wilson. He asked each of his 15 ministers in turn to say “yes” or “no.” It was a unanimous yes.

The declaration was signed in a nearby conference room, beneath a portrait of the young Queen Elizabeth, and for the first time since American independence in 1776, a British colony was in rebellion.

Smith delivered his radio address, telling a stunned and frightened nation: “So far and no further”. Then he went home to bed.

“I was immensely upset,” he wrote later. “There was within my whole system a very strong desire to preserve my links with the history and tradition and culture I had been brought up to believe in. It was a terrible decision.”

In December 1966, with Wilson’s forecast of UDI being “a matter of weeks rather than months” firmly buried, Smith, with British governor Sir Humphrey Gibbs, was in an RAF Britannia on its way to Gibraltar and the frigate, HMS Tiger, for the first contact with Wilson in over a year.

Smith was given a spell at the controls. For 25 minutes rebel prime minister was alone in the cockpit of a British aircraft with Her Majesty’s governor aboard, while the crew had a break. Aboard the frigate, Wilson tried to humiliate Smith. He took the admiral’s cabin and put the Rhodesians in non-commissioned quarters with a shared toilet.

In their first meeting, he shouted at Smith. Smith rose, stared out at the Mediterranean for interminable minutes and then told Wilson to behave himself. Back in Salisbury, his cabinet rejected the proposals.

Wilson and Smith next met in October 1968 aboard HMS Fearless. This time Wilson, on the advice of his secretary, Lady Falkender, treated Smith hospitably, but resolution remained elusive.

Edward Heath’s Conservative government in 1970 made far more progress with Smith and an agreement was ready for conclusion, pending only the approval of the black population. Unrest and overwhelming resistance greeted Lord Pearce’s mission to assess black opinion, and the bid failed.

The ensuing 70s ended the complacency of booming, peaceful UDI Rhodesia. Guerilla forces opened their long war against Smith with an attack on Altena farm in Mount Darwin in December 1972. In April 1974, the right-wing regime in Portugal was toppled in a coup. In October 1974, South African prime minister John Vorster launched his policy of “détente” with black Africa.

He demanded that Smith release the black nationalist leaders in detention. Smith gave in and agreed, and the relationship with his most important ally was suddenly undermined.

Without warning Smith, Vorster removed the contingent of South African police guarding the northern border against guerilla incursions. Smith was shocked. One could expect this from the British, he said, but now with the South Africans, “there was obvious deceit”.

Vorster kept on squeezing Smith. The supply from South Africa of fuel, munitions and aircraft spares for what was now a substantial war began to dry up. The Rhodesian war effort was severely curtailed.

Smith’s impotent anger was clear in his remark then: “I longed for those carefree days when I was flying around the skies in my Spitfire, saying to myself: ‘let anyone cross my path and he will have to take what comes his way’.” Vorster’s first attempt to bring Smith and the black nationalists together was in August 1975, in the majestic setting of South Africa’s luxury White Train parked in the middle of the bridge over the Victoria Falls.

Smith laid down his position, the nationalists barked demands and they broke up in a muddle after about an hour.

His trip to Pretoria on September 18 1976, to meet United States secretary of state Henry Kissinger, signalled the final stage of his rebellion. A few months before he had made his famously regrettable statement: “I don’t believe in black majority rule ever in Rhodesia, not in a thousand years.”

The trip began inauspiciously. At a rugby test match between the Springboks and the All Blacks, Vorster had the Rhodesian delegation shunted to the side of the VIP stand, well away from his own group. “We were on our own,” Smith said.

The meeting in the American embassy in Pretoria was an event of great emotion for both the Rhodesian farmer and the world’s most powerful diplomat. Kissinger proposed black majority rule in two years, and any subsequent proposals would be infinitely worse.

As he spelt out the situation, he was wiping tears away from his eyes. “This is the first time in my life I have asked anyone to commit political suicide,” he told Smith. “You have no alternative. I feel for you.”

Smith was sunk in despair, but awed by Kissinger. “He spoke with obvious sincerity and there was great emotion in his voice. For a while words escaped him,” he said.

Kissinger’s ultimatum was “the coup de grace”, he said. “We were rudderless after that.”

In September 1977, Smith did the unthinkable. Without consulting his cabinet, he flew to Lusaka in the private jet of Lonrho chairman Tiny Rowland, for a day’s talks with Kenneth Kaunda, a few kilometres from a major guerilla base. The Zambian president “couldn’t have been kinder”, but the initiative failed.

Smith again tried to settle without the rest of the world and pursued a settlement outside the military alliance between Nkomo’s and Robert Mugabe’s Patriotic Front. On March 1978, he signed the “internal agreement” with Bishop Abel Muzorewa, the Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole and two tribal leaders.

The country’s first one-man, one-vote elections in April 1979 drew a 63% turnout, were won by Muzorewa’s United African National Council and the country became Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. Nearly no-one recognised it and the war continued. Smith vacated his office and Independence for Muzorewa on May 31 1979 and moved into a plain double-storey in the suburbs.

Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative victory in May finally resulted in the Lancaster House constitutional conference in London under foreign secretary Lord Carrington.

Smith was irrelevant at Lancaster House, raging fruitlessly against the “treachery” of almost everyone from Carrington to members of his own delegation. When they voted in November on the proposed constitution, Smith was the only dissenter.

He boycotted the post-agreement party, and went to dinner instead with former RAF colleagues and Douglas Bader. He refused to attend the “nauseating” signing ceremony on December 19. On March 2 1980, near the end of vote counting in the just-ended election, it was clear that Zanu PF was heading for an overwhelming victory. Smith was surprised to receive a call to meet Mugabe at his house.

Mugabe assured Smith he would adhere to a private enterprise economy and to retain the confidence of the whites. He referred to the country as “this jewel of Africa“.

Smith went home in astonishment and told Janet he hoped he had not been hallucinating. Mugabe “behaved like a balanced Western gentleman, the antithesis of the communist gangster I had expected,” he said.

Zanu PF won 57 out of the 80 black seats created by the new constitution, but the RF won all 20 white seats, with Smith still the party leader. For the Independence celebrations on April 18, he went on holiday to South Africa, telling Mugabe it would be “the tactful thing to do”. The two men met several times, until in 1981 Smith criticised his plans for a one-party state. Mugabe stopped the meetings.

In December 1982 Smith was briefly arrested, his Harare and Gwenoro homes were searched and he was forced to surrender his passport. To Mugabe’s chagrin, Smith was returned to parliament in the 1985 elections, but a year later was suspended for denouncing black majority rule, and again in 1987 for dismissing Mugabe’s threats of sanctions against South Africa as “a waste of time”. Before he could return, the constitutional provision for 20 reserved white seats was abolished.

Smith leaves behind two stepchildren, Robert and Jean, from Janet’s previous marriage. His and Janet’s own son, Alec, died of a heart attack in London last year, to Smith’s deep grief.

(Source)

Next Page »