Sat 25 Apr 2009
I have not bought a Herald newspaper for at least 10 years. The reasons are many but mainly relate to the fact that for as long as I can remember your paper has been an apologist for the government and what in the past has been called the “ruling Party”.
However on Wednesday this week some colleagues said that I had to read an Op Ed that appeared in your newspaper that morning. I borrowed a copy and with disbelief at first and finally anger, I read what you had written on the front page of the paper about the American and the British Ambassadors. An article under a pseudonym on the centre page of the paper further compounded this.
Firstly I am disgusted by this blatant example of how your paper, under your leadership, continues to flagrantly violate the fundamental tenants of your profession and the terms of the Global Political Agreement signed in September last year in an attempt to restore some pride and dignity to this broken nation.
Secondly I think this was a cowardly act in that there is no way that either of these two men, at the pinnacle of long and distinguished careers can respond or defend themselves in any way. You are secure in this knowledge and the fact that the corrupt and distorted legal system in this country would not allow them to take legal action against you for slander as I am sure would be possible in more balanced and just societies.
But my criticism goes way beyond this in our present situation. Both men are due for reassignment and in the case of the
On purely political grounds, these Ambassadors speak, not for themselves, but for their Governments, when they demand that we adhere to the principles and values that guided the liberation movements and the world community in the struggle for justice and freedom in
On Wednesday I sat next to the new Director of the World Food Programme in
Both Ambassadors have overseen a doubling of official development assistance and humanitarian aid to
Last year
Nobody, nobody was more responsible for this than the two Ambassadors who worked tirelessly to persuade a sceptical watching world that we were worth the effort. I would like to take you (the Editor) to any part of
In half these cases you would be told it is American Aid. Between
I would like to take you to a clinic in my constituency where I would show you a clinic, which 6 months ago was derelict and overgrown, with few staff on duty and no drugs. Now you would find it spotless – cleaned by staff who are suddenly able to come to work. You would see lines of people receiving health services, much of it free. Ask them what has made the difference and they will tell you it is the allowances they are receiving from an organisation funded by DIFID – the aid arm of the British Government. The Ambassador is personally responsible for this initiative where they are trying to help us retain staff in the medical field. I spoke to the CEO of the Bank that handles these payments and they did not even know that the millions of dollars they were handling came mainly from the
By slandering and abusing these men you are failing in your duty as Editor of the largest daily in
You must know that key decision makers in many capitals will have read this piece of writing in your newspaper. It will have been read by Susan Rice at the United Nations, by the new Under Secretary of State for
Donors from foreign lands are today spending US$3 million a DAY in
In January, the total tax receipts of the
Eddie Cross
24th April 2009
(Source)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.