Wed 27 Jun 2007
Books: A look at the Viscount disasters in Rhodesia…
Posted by admin under Publications
No Comments
When I wrote “Without Honour†last year, I spent many hours on the internet doing research for the historical background that I wrote at the beginning of the book. I felt that it was very important to establish historical events for readers as some of it happened so long ago that we have forgotten, and then there are readers that do not live in the regional and are unaware of some of the finer points.
Perhaps one of the biggest single events for me during the bush war, was the shooting down of first one Air
There were no survivors of the second atrocity.
I am always interested in other people’s opinions and views and so, when I found this page on the internet today, I felt that it was a must that I should share with those out there that remember with sadness, anger and futility the events that saw such a waste of innocent life.
The page that I took this from was written by Rob Rickards.
from “Serving Secretly†by Ken Flower
Page 210…
“On 3 September an incident occurred which put an immediate end to the Nkomo/Smith negotiations. This ’stroke of fate’, as Smith described it, forced all the players in the Rhodesian game on to a different course.
An Air Rhodesia Viscount was shot down by Nkomo’s ZIPRA guerrillas, using a Russian SAM-7 ground-to-air missile, shortly after take-off from Kariba to
I well remember Smith’s double-edged reaction to the ’stroke of fate’: firstly, great relief and a sudden release of tension for, ironically, settlement with Nkomo had by 3 September been there for the taking and Smith might have had to grasp it, to his own embarrassment and the condemnation of many of his party; and secondly, righteous shock and horror.â€
Page 219…
“Within a week of my return to
-o00o-
from “Rhodesians Never Die†by Peter Godwin & Ian Hancock
Page 288…
“Two days after Smith’s speech, and eleven minutes after taking off from Kariba, bound for
Wreckage was spotted from the air the next morning, and a ground search arrived soon after. Thirty-eight bodies were found in and around the aircraft, obviously victims of the crash. Another ten were heaped together a short distance away, all of them shot dead. Three survivors were found near the scene, and another five – who had walked off looking for help – were located later. A macabre story soon emerged. A heat-seeking SAM-7 missile had hit the inner starboard engine. Captain Hood almost executed a safe crash landing in a cotton field except for the last moment when the Viscount hit a ditch and broke up. The tail section broke away and eighteen lives were saved. Half an hour after the crash, and after the five had gone for help, a group of ‘terrorists’ appeared on the crash scene and ordered the remaining survivors to assemble whereupon they opened fire with their AK-47s. Three started running and got away, and watched as the ‘terrorists’ looted the aircraft before finally leaving.
For days on end, White Rhodesia was overwhelmed by shock, grief, and anger, a reaction strengthened by the further news that Umtali’s residential suburbs were rocketed on the night of 8 September. The demand for instant retaliation extended through the Security Forces, stopping only when it reached Walls. The anger increased with the news that Nkomo had claimed credit for downing the plane – while denying that ZIPRA had killed any survivors – and had accused Air
Cheryl Tilley, the sister of the schoolboy killed by ‘terrorists’ in January, did not survive the incident, nor did her fiancé. Captain Hood and his co-pilot died on impact and became instant heroes because of their skilful and valiant attempts to save the aircraft. Hood’s own story saddened its readers. A
Outrage was certainly evident by 6 September when parliament met to debate the estimates. By then the execution of the ten survivors was uppermost in members’ minds.
The killers became ‘vermin’, ’sub-humans’, ‘Neanderthal’, ‘animals’. Their presumed backers – most notably Owen, Carter, and Andrew Young – were, in the words of the Afrikaner farmer who represented Karoi, ‘dripping with blood -blood from the innocent and helpless’. The RF’s Chief Whip assured the government that feeling was ‘running high about this matter’ as members canvassed the potential responses: more raids into
Calmer voices could not compete with the wrath of a society. Bishop Paul Burrough appealed to Rhodesians not to seek revenge and to remember that ‘the most grievous suffering is still among the defenceless people in the tribal trust lands’. A spokesman for the mourning Asian family pleaded for peace and said he feared retaliation. But the words urging caution, brotherly love, and reconciliation were ignored in the memorial services held around
The Dean and Bishop Burrough wanted the demonstrators to leave. Some of the crowd agreed. It was not the time or the place for political spectacle. Yet the RF back-bench, most of the electorate, the hot bloods in the Security Forces, and the demonstrators outside All Saints Cathedral all wanted that message delivered to the Patriotic Front.
Smith announced the NATJOC decisions on 11 September. He made his now-familiar denunciation of the British and American governments whom he blamed for the escalation of ‘terrorism’ and for the Elim and Viscount ‘massacres’, and he accused Julius Nyerere of being the ‘evil genius’ behind Nkomo. The Prime Minister admitted that his contacts with Kaunda and Nkomo had become unpopular but insisted that these negotiations had been in the best interests of the country and would resume if necessary. The ’stroke of fate’ – as Smith called the Viscount incident – may have horrified him; it also saved him from having to sell Nkomo to a suspicious electorate. Forced back upon his colleagues in the Transitional government, Smith made the best of the situation by calling upon the Rhodesians to exercise their virtues of ingenuity, energy, resourcefulness, and ‘well-known and well-acclaimed valour’. They should accept his measures and eschew the desperate alternatives of capitulation or making a do-or-die stand. He knew that his earlier remarks in parliament had fuelled some unrealistic expectations. The Herald, which had previously urged caution, described Smith’s speech as a ‘damp squib’, and claimed that the overwhelming public response was one of bitter disappointment. A minority opinion was that he could do little else. Relieved that Smith had not launched a programme of vengeance, NUF accused him of incompetent leadership and called for his resignation and the formation of a national government. The RAP was predictably contemptuous, and called for a ‘ruthless prosecution of the war’. Ever hopeful, the party expected a surge in support following Smith’s apparent failure to read the mood of the electorate. Once again, it was disappointed. In no time, the electorate resumed its customary position of accepting that ‘Smithy’ was doing his best.â€
Page 243…
“On
-o00o-
from “The Great Betrayal†by Ian Douglas Smith
Page 266…
“With a traumatic week just over, with a number of innocent civilians being murdered by terrorists, all of them black people — their only crime that they were not prepared to co-operate in terrorism – came the news of the tragic disaster of the shooting down of one of our civilian Viscount aircraft on its flight from Victoria Falls via Kariba to Salisbury on late Sunday afternoon, 3 September. The terrorists had managed to procure a number of heat-seeking missiles from those sources all over the world that are looking for financial gain, even at the cost of human life and tragedy. The bringing down of the aircraft and, still worse, the cold-blooded murder by the terrorists of ten of the survivors, including women and children, caused a degree of anger among Rhodesians difficult to control. During the days that followed, resentment and the accompanying desire to exact retribution mounted and I received more than one representation seeking permission to enter the area of the tragedy and make the local people pay for their crime of harbouring and assisting the terrorists. I, too, would have derived great satisfaction in getting to grips with the gangsters associated with the crime, but sadly, this is easier said than done. We would continue to hunt down and destroy terrorism wherever it was found, but we knew on the evidence before us that many, if not the majority, of the tribal people were not voluntarily on the side of the terrorists, but had had pistols pointed at their heads. There was a strong feeling for me to broadcast to the nation, and on Sunday 10 September I announced that the government would introduce ‘a modification of martial law which will enable us to streamline procedures in order to facilitate the prosecution of our war effort while at the same time leaving intact those civil authorities which are required to play their part’. The new measures, I said, were to be applied in particular areas as and when required, and not on a nation-wide basis many, if not the majority, of the tribal people were not voluntarily on the side of the terrorists, but had had pistols pointed at their heads. So it was necessary, although difficult, to counsel cool heads and remind people that two wrongs do not make a right: the sins of the gangsters should not be visited upon their fellow-tribesmen.â€
-o00o-
from “The Story of My Life†by Joshua Nkomo
Page 165…
“But our success against the Rhodesian Air Force was far greater than they allowed to be known at the time. We could not claim the credit that we deserved, because we needed to keep secret the fact that we had been given some Soviet surface-to-air missiles, Sam-7s. We deployed them first in defence of our camps in
These tragic incidents need explaining. The Rhodesians used their civil airliners equally for carrying passengers and for carrying troops. The first time we shot one down was immediately after Smith’s troops had carried out a particularly brutal attack on the camps at Chimoio, in
Of course it was not our policy to shoot down civil airliners: if we had wanted to we could have done so often, but we carefully refrained from that. What happened was that we identified one of the same aircraft that had been shown on television loaded with troops. It landed at
It was a tragic mistake. I felt it personally. One man was killed with his mother and father and his wife and children – the whole family wiped out. Their name was Gulab, Zimbabweans of Indian origin. Mr Gulab was a good friend of mine, who often fixed me up with airline tickets in ways that avoided alerting the police. I regret his loss very much.
The Rhodesian propaganda people at once claimed that our anti-aircraft team had killed ten survivors on the ground. This was obviously untrue, since the plane fell well away from the firing-point. Some of our ZIPRA boys did approach the crash site, and did help the eight survivors to get to safety, bringing them water and looking after them. I truly have no idea how the ten died. I do not believe they were killed by our people: I hope not.
I then made an error of a different kind. The following day the BBC telephoned me for a comment on the shooting-down. I told them as much of the truth as I knew. Then, fairly enough in the circumstances, they asked me what weapon the plane had been brought down with. Clearly I could not say it was a Sam-7: it was a secret that we had such things. To turn the question aside, I answered that we had brought it down by throwing stones, and as I said so I laughed a bit. I was not laughing at the deaths of all those civilians, but at the evasive answer. The laugh was remembered, rather than my regret at those unnecessary deaths. In retaliation for the first Viscount disaster, the Rhodesians mounted a savage raid on our Freedom Camp, just north of
Later we again brought down one of Air
Walls had changed planes, and was aboard the second. Walls and his staff officers were clearly a legitimate target. A few years later, when I was a minister and he was commanding our post-independence army, I asked him why he had swapped planes. He just laughed. We talked about when his troops raided my home in
I still wonder whether Walls had switched aircraft because they had intercepted our radio talk and knew it was a likely target. We, of course, could not say publicly that Walls was our target; we could not admit either that we had a sophisticated radio link, or that we had spies in all the civil airports of
One other attempt to shoot down a civil airliner was unsuccessful. The target was PW Botha, the South African defence minister, who was flying in to
Botha was a legitimate target – but the missile malfunctioned, and missed his aircraft. He left in a hurry, without performing his task of inaugurating a swimming-pool for the troops.
The worst thing about the war was the callousness it bred. It is true, and I regret it, that atrocities were committed by people on our side, by ZIPRA fighters as well as by ZANLA men. Some of those killed were isolated white farmers and their families who happened to be in the way. Some were African chiefs who may have collaborated with the Smith regime, but who had little alternative if their own families and their people were to survive. It was not our policy to kill such people. But armed men, alone or in small groups, may come to disregard the importance of human life. It was necessary to fight a guerrilla war, and in such a war terrible things are bound to happen.â€
-o00o-
I don’t suppose there is much to be gained in reliving these horrific events – apart from the fact that many of the people that carried out these atrocities are today either in positions of some authority or are living in abject poverty in
Poetic justice or not, I post this so that we can understand a little more of the mind set, a little more of the thought process that drove the different sides to fight so ferociously for so many years…
Take care.
‘debvhu

No Responses to “ Books: A look at the Viscount disasters in Rhodesia… ”